The Public's Health: Public Health and the President's Racism | Public Health Post

President Trump has a history of statements that suggests he harbors racist sentiments and of actions that would back up these same sentiments. He seemed to lay to rest any doubt about his inclinations in reported statements in the Oval Office that the United States should not be granting admission to residents from “shithole” countries

That the President of the United States used such terminology appropriately resulted in a collective furor. Vice President Biden in a tweet suggested that “It’s not how a President should speak. It’s not how a President should behave. Most of all, it’s not what a President should believe.” There seems little question the President’s words fall far beneath the level of dignity and decorum one might expect from the leader of the world’s oldest constitutional democracy.  But why does the President’s racism matter for the health of the public?
To answer this question, one needs to understand how health is produced. Health in populations is the product of the social, economic, and cultural context in which we live. Cultural context determines the social norms that bind us and that in turn determine our behaviors and their consequences. 
On the positive side, changing norms can promote health. For example, this was abundantly evident in the decline in cigarette smoking and motor vehicle deaths in the United States during the latter half of the twentieth century; the former was attributable to change in public perceptions about smoking and the latter to a widespread acceptance of vehicular and road safety measures. 
The office of President wields perhaps the world’s largest megaphone. The President's words and actions can change the norms that bind us, and empower elements of hate in society to act out their worst impulses. This results in more hate crimes, more exclusion of minority groups from salutary resources, and a return of growing segregation of racial groups that in and of itself generates inequitable access to healthy resources and poor mental and physical health.
The President’s actions have, unfortunately, backed up his words. For example, the administration’s attempt to ban immigration from predominantly Muslim countries, and its rescinding of Obama administration guidance to schools to enforce the right of transgender children to use whichever bathroom they choose may, at face value, affect only a small number of people. But they enable the chiseling away at social norms that value inclusiveness and diversity, tolerance and accommodation to those who are otherwise different than the mainstream.
Racism is morally repugnant and needs no link to health to be so. And yet racist comments make discrimination acceptable and cruelty mainstream. Trump’s racist words offer cover for policymakers intent on denying the existence of racial disparities in care, and thereby impede the institution of possible remedies. Further, his words lower the self-regard of millions who, feeling threatened or renounced, do not care for themselves because they believe others have little interest in their health and lives.

Michael Stein & Sandro Galea